Cause of Abdominal Ultrasound Diagnostic Errors in Children with Acute Appendicitis

Yoo Mi Kim; Jae Hee Chung

doi:10.13029/jkaps.2016.22.2.33

Articles

Page Path

Original Article

Cause of Abdominal Ultrasound Diagnostic Errors in Children with Acute Appendicitis

Yoo Mi Kim, Jae Hee Chung

Journal of the Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons 2016;22(2):33-37.
Published online: December 22, 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13029/jkaps.2016.22.2.33

Department of Surgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, School of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

Correspondence: Jae Hee Chung, Department of Surgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, School of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 10 63-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 07345, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3779-1040, Fax: +82-2-786-0802, jhjung@catholic.ac.kr

• Received: June 13, 2016 • Revised: September 12, 2016 • Accepted: October 11, 2016

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

152 Views
0 Download
1 Crossref

prev next

Full Article

Download PDF

ABSTRACT
NOTES
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Purpose
The use of CT as a diagnostic tool in pediatric acute appendicitis is increasing because of its high sensitivity and specificity. However, due to both the serious concerns about radiation of CT and the convenience and reasonable cost of ultrasound (US) examination, US has value on the initial diagnosis of acute appendicitis despite of the lower sensitivity in children. The purpose of this study was to examine the factors that affect the rate of false negative diagnosis of the ultrasound from the patients who received laparoscopic appendectomy.
Methods
The pediatric appendectomy cases from 2002 to 2013 in Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital have been reviewed through the medical records. We included patients who underwent an initial screening by ultrasound examination.
Results
Among 181 patients, 156 patients were the sono-positive group and 25 patients were sono-negative group. There is no significant difference in ages, genders, physical examination findings and white blood cell count between the two groups. But, the degree of inflammation of appendicitis (simple, 58.3% vs. 32.0%; complicated, 41.7% vs. 68.0%) and the appendix position (antececal, 85.0% vs. 12.0%; retrocecal, 13.7% vs. 44.0%; pelvic, 1.3% vs. 44.0%) were significantly different between the two groups (sono-positive group vs. sono-negative group; p<0.05).
Conclusion
The position of the appendix may act as a factor that causes an error in the diagnostic ultrasound, especially, in the retrocecal type and the pelvic type with the higher risk of necrosis or perforation.
Keywords: Appendicitis; Ultrasonography; Diagnostic errors

NOTES

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

REFERENCES

1. Mostbeck G, Adam EJ, Nielsen MB, Claudon M, Clevert D, Nicolau C, et al. How to diagnose acute appendicitis: ultrasound first. Insights Imaging 2016;7:255-263.
2. van den Bogaard VA, Euser SM, van der Ploeg T, de Korte N, Sanders DG, de Winter D, et al. Diagnosing perforated appendicitis in pediatric patients: a new model. J Pediatr Surg 2016;51:444-448.
3. Galai T, Beloosesky OZ, Scolnik D, Rimon A, Glatstein M. Misdiagnosis of acute appendicitis in children attending the emergency department: the experience of a large, tertiary care pediatric hospital. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2016;01. 08. [Epub].
4. Reynolds SL. Missed appendicitis in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 1993;9:1-3.
5. Rothrock SG, Skeoch G, Rush JJ, Johnson NE. Clinical features of misdiagnosed appendicitis in children. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:45-50.
6. Puylaert JB. Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 1986;158:355-360.
7. Craig S, Dalton S. Diagnosing appendicitis: what works, what does not and where to from here? J Pediatr Child Health 2016;52:168-173.
8. Duke E, Kalb B, Arif-Tiwari H, Daye ZJ, Gilbertson-Dahdal D, Keim SM, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of MRI for evaluation of acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016;206:508-517.
9. Cohen B, Bowling J, Midulla P, Shlasko E, Lester N, Rosenberg H, et al. The non-diagnostic ultrasound in appendicitis: is a non-visualized appendix the same as a negative study? J Pediatr Surg 2015;50:923-927.
10. Samuel M. Pediatric appendicitis score. J Pediatr Surg 2002;37:877-881.
11. Chung JB, Jeon SY, Song YT. A clinical score and ultrasonography for the diagnosis of childhood acute appendicits. J Korean Assoc Pediatr Surg 2004;10:117-122.
12. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:289-296.
13. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2012;380:499-505.
14. Partain KN, Patel A, Travers C, McCracken CE, Loewen J, Braithwaite K, et al. Secondary signs may improve the diagnostic accuracy of equivocal ultrasounds for suspected appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg 2016;51:1655-1660.
15. Butler M, Servaes S, Srinivasan A, Edgar JC, Del Pozo G, Darge K. US depiction of the appendix: role of abdominal wall thickness and appendiceal location. Emerg Radiol 2011;18:525-531.
16. Herscu G, Kong A, Russell D, Tran CL, Varela JE, Cohen A, et al. Retrocecal appendix location and perforation at presentation. Am Surg 2006;72:890-893.
17. Yap TL, Chen Y, Low WW, Ong CC, Nah SA, Jacobsen AS, et al. A new 2-step risk-stratification clinical score for suspected appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg 2015;50:2051-2055.

Table 1

Characteristics of Patients Who Received Appendectomy with Acute Appendicitis (n=181)

Values are presented as mean±SD or n (%).

Seg., segmented; exam., examination; RLQ, right lower quadrant; DT, direct tenderness; RT, rebound tenderness; MG, muscle guarding.

Table 2

Characteristics of Patients with Negative Ultrasonographic Finding (n=25)

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Computed tomography scan usage when US results are non-diagnostic for suspected acute appendicitis in children
Injoon Kim, Hyuksool Kwon, Yoo Jin Choi, Young Ho Kwak, Jin Hee Lee, Dongbum Suh, Jae Yun Jung, Joong Wan Park
Medicine.2020; 99(36): e21961. CrossRef

Cite

CITE

export

Copy Download

Format
XML Download

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Cause of Abdominal Ultrasound Diagnostic Errors in Children with Acute Appendicitis

J Korean Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2016;22(2):33-37. Published online December 22, 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13029/jkaps.2016.22.2.33

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
bib — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Cause of Abdominal Ultrasound Diagnostic Errors in Children with Acute Appendicitis

J Korean Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2016;22(2):33-37. Published online December 22, 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13029/jkaps.2016.22.2.33

Cause of Abdominal Ultrasound Diagnostic Errors in Children with Acute Appendicitis

Table 1

Characteristics of Patients Who Received Appendectomy with Acute Appendicitis (n=181)

Values are presented as mean±SD or n (%).

Seg., segmented; exam., examination; RLQ, right lower quadrant; DT, direct tenderness; RT, rebound tenderness; MG, muscle guarding.

Table 2

Characteristics of Patients with Negative Ultrasonographic Finding (n=25)

Table 1 Characteristics of Patients Who Received Appendectomy with Acute Appendicitis (n=181)

Values are presented as mean±SD or n (%).

Seg., segmented; exam., examination; RLQ, right lower quadrant; DT, direct tenderness; RT, rebound tenderness; MG, muscle guarding.

Table 2 Characteristics of Patients with Negative Ultrasonographic Finding (n=25)

Articles

Page Path

Cause of Abdominal Ultrasound Diagnostic Errors in Children with Acute Appendicitis

Full Article

ABSTRACT

NOTES

REFERENCES

Characteristics of Patients Who Received Appendectomy with Acute Appendicitis (n=181)

Characteristics of Patients with Negative Ultrasonographic Finding (n=25)

Figure & Data

References

Citations

CITE

Download Citation

Format:

Include:

Characteristics of Patients Who Received Appendectomy with Acute Appendicitis (n=181)

Characteristics of Patients with Negative Ultrasonographic Finding (n=25)

Table 1

Table 2

ABOUT

BROWSE ARTICLES

EDITORIAL POLICY

FOR CONTRIBUTORS