Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • KAPS
  • E-Submission

APS : Advances in Pediatric Surgery

OPEN ACCESS
Search
Advanced Search
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Page Path

Original Article

How Reliable Are Diagnostic Methods of Hirschsprung Disease?

Hanbaro Kim, Dae Yeon Kim, Seong Chul Kim, Jung-Man Namgoong, Ji-Hee Hwang
Journal of the Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons 2014;20(2):33-37.
Published online: December 30, 2014

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Correspondence: Dae Yeon Kim, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3010-3961, Fax: +82-2-474-9027, kimdy@amc.seoul.kr
• Received: August 4, 2014   • Revised: October 1, 2014   • Accepted: October 1, 2014

Copyright © 2014 by the Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 0 Views
  • 0 Download
prev next

Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF
  • Purpose
    The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the non-invasive diagnostic methods and rectal suction biopsy for the detection of Hirschsprung disease (HD).
  • Methods
    We reviewed diagnostic methods and results retrospectively in patients who underwent anorectal manometry, barium enema and rectal suction biopsy for the diagnosis of HD at Asan Medical Center from January 2000 to December 2012.
  • Results
    There were 97 patients (59 neonates and 38 infants) in the study period. The overall accuracy of anorectal manometry for the diagnosis of HD was 71.1% and its sensitivity was 51.4% (48.1% in neonate and 62.5% in infant, respectively) and its overall specificity was 82.3% (81.3% in neonate and 83.3% in infant, respectively). The Overall accuracy of barium enema was 66.0% (72.8% in neonate and 55.3% in infant, respectively) and specificity of barium enema was 53.2% (56.3% in neonate and 50.0% in infant, respectively). These results were lower than those of anorectal manometry. The overall sensitivity of barium enema was 88.6% (92.6% in neonate and 75.0% in infant, respectively) and it was higher than the sensitivity of anorectal manometry. Histological studies confirmed HD in 35 patients, in one of whom the suction biopsy showed negative finding.
  • Conclusion
    Accuracy of non-invasive methods for diagnosis of HD in our study is lower than those in previous study, so we need to improve the quality of diagnostic tools in our hospital. We conclude that the rectal suction biopsy is the most accurate test for diagnosing HD, so the biopsy to confirm the diagnosis of the HD is very important.
  • Keywords: Hirschsprung disease; Anorectal manometry; Barium enema; Rectal suction biopsy; Accuracy

This study was presented at the 30th Annual Congress of Korean Society of Pediatric Surgeons.

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

  • 1. de Lorijn F, Reitsma JB, Voskuijl WP, Aronson DC, Ten Kate FJ, Smets AM, et al. Diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease: a prospective, comparative accuracy study of common tests. J Pediatr 2005;146:787-792.
  • 2. de Lorijn F, Kremer LC, Reitsma JB, Benninga MA. Diagnostic tests in Hirschsprung disease: a systematic review. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2006;42:496-505.
  • 3. Osatakul S, Patrapinyokul S, Osatakul N. The diagnostic value of anorectal manometry as a screening test for Hirschsprung's disease. J Med Assoc Thai 1999;82:1100-1105.
  • 4. Emir H, Akman M, Sarimurat N, Kiliç N, Erdoğan E, Söylet Y. Anorectal manometry during the neonatal period: its specificity in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1999;9:101-103.
  • 5. Kim DY, Kim SC, Kim KM, Kim ER, Kim KS, Kim JS, et al. Diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease of neonate and infant. J Korean Assoc Pediatr Surg 2002;8:1-5.
  • 6. Kurer MH, Lawson JO, Pambakian H. Suction biopsy in Hirschsprung's disease. Arch Dis Child 1986;61:83-84.
  • 7. Martucciello G, Pini Prato A, Puri P, Holschneider AM, Meier-Ruge W, Jasonni V, et al. Controversies concerning diagnostic guidelines for anomalies of the enteric nervous system: a report from the fourth International Symposium on Hirschsprung's disease and related neurocristopathies. J Pediatr Surg 2005;40:1527-1531.
  • 8. Noviello C, Cobellis G, Romano M, Amici G, Martino A. Diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease: an age-related approach in children below or above one year. Colorectal dis 2010;12:1044-1048.
  • 9. Holschneider AM, Meier-Ruge W, Ure BM. Hirschsprung's disease and allied disorders--a review. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1994;4:260-266.
  • 10. Choi YI, Choi SO, Park WH. Diagnostic strategy using barium enema and rectal suction biopsy with acetylcholinesterase histochemistry in neonates suspected of having Hirschsprung's disease. J Korean Assoc Pediatr Surg 2001;7:105-111.
  • 11. Taxman TL, Yulish BS, Rothstein FC. How useful is the barium enema in the diagnosis of infantile Hirschsprung's disease? Am J Dis Child 1986;140:881-884.
  • 12. Rosenfield NS, Ablow RC, Markowitz RI, DiPietro M, Seashore JH, Touloukian RJ, et al. Hirschsprung disease: accuracy of the barium enema examination. Radiology 1984;150:393-400.
  • 13. Zhou XL, Chen FB, Ou BY, Zhang XP, Jiang MZ. Evaluation of clinical value of anorectal manometry for diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease in neonate. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi 2004;42:681-683.
  • 14. Ito Y, Donahoe PK, Hendren WH. Maturation of the rectoanal response in premature and perinatal infants. J Pediatr Surg 1977;12:477-482.
  • 15. Holschneider AM, Kellner E, Streibl P, Sippell WG. The development of anorectal continence and its significance in the diagnosiso of Hirschsprung's disease. J Pediatr Surg 1976;11:151-156.
  • 16. Aaronson I, Nixon HH. A clinical evaluation of anorectal pressure studies in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease. Gut 1972;13:138-146.
  • 17. Benninga MA, Omari TI, Haslam RR, Barnett CP, Dent J, Davidson GP. Characterization of anorectal pressure and the anorectal inhibitory reflex in healthy preterm and term infants. J Pediatr 2001;139:233-237.
  • 18. Kawahara H, Kubota A, Hasegawa T, Okuyama H, Ueno T, Watanabe T, et al. Anorectal sleeve micromanometry for the diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease in newborns. J Pediatr Surg 2007;42:2075-2079.
  • 19. Huang Y, Zheng S, Xiao X. Preliminary evaluation of anorectal manometry in diagnosing Hirschsprung's disease in neonates. Pediatr Surg Int 2009;25:41-45.
  • 20. Andrassy RJ, Isaacs H, Weitzman JJ. Rectal suction biopsy for the diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease. Ann Surg 1981;193:419-424.
  • 21. Lake BD, Puri P, Nixon HH, Claireaux AE. Hirschsprung's disease: an appraisal of histochemically demonstrated acetylcholinesterase activity in suction rectal biopsy specimens as an aid to diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1978;102:244-247.
  • 22. Yadav L, Kini U, Das K, Mohanty S, Puttegowda D. Calretinin immunohistochemistry versus improvised rapid Acetylcholinesterase histochemistry in the evaluation of colorectal biopsies for Hirschsprung disease. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2014;57:369-375.
  • 23. Holschneider AM, Puri P. Hirschsprung's disease and allied disorders. 3rd ed. Berlin, New York: Springer; 2006.
Table 1
Test Results of Barium Enema

Values are presented as patients' number.

HD, Hirschsprung disease.

jkaps-20-33-i001.jpg
Table 2
Test Results of Anorectal Manometry

Values are presented as patients' number.

HD, Hirschsprung disease; RAIR, recto-anal inhibitory reflex.

jkaps-20-33-i002.jpg
Table 3
Test Results of Suction Biopsy

Values are presented as patients' number.

HD, Hirschsprung disease.

jkaps-20-33-i003.jpg
Table 4
Direct Comparison of Accuracy

BE, barium enema; ARM, anorectal manometry; RSB, rectal suction biopsy.

jkaps-20-33-i004.jpg

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

How Reliable Are Diagnostic Methods of Hirschsprung Disease?
J Korean Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2014;20(2):33-37.   Published online December 30, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13029/jkaps.2014.20.2.33
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.
Format:
Include:
How Reliable Are Diagnostic Methods of Hirschsprung Disease?
J Korean Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2014;20(2):33-37.   Published online December 30, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13029/jkaps.2014.20.2.33
Close
How Reliable Are Diagnostic Methods of Hirschsprung Disease?
How Reliable Are Diagnostic Methods of Hirschsprung Disease?

Test Results of Barium Enema

Values are presented as patients' number.

HD, Hirschsprung disease.

Test Results of Anorectal Manometry

Values are presented as patients' number.

HD, Hirschsprung disease; RAIR, recto-anal inhibitory reflex.

Test Results of Suction Biopsy

Values are presented as patients' number.

HD, Hirschsprung disease.

Direct Comparison of Accuracy

BE, barium enema; ARM, anorectal manometry; RSB, rectal suction biopsy.

Table 1 Test Results of Barium Enema

Values are presented as patients' number.

HD, Hirschsprung disease.

Table 2 Test Results of Anorectal Manometry

Values are presented as patients' number.

HD, Hirschsprung disease; RAIR, recto-anal inhibitory reflex.

Table 3 Test Results of Suction Biopsy

Values are presented as patients' number.

HD, Hirschsprung disease.

Table 4 Direct Comparison of Accuracy

BE, barium enema; ARM, anorectal manometry; RSB, rectal suction biopsy.

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

APS : Advances in Pediatric Surgery

ABOUT

BROWSE ARTICLES

EDITORIAL POLICY

FOR CONTRIBUTORS

© The Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons.