Biliary atresia (BA) is an infantile cholestatic disease of progressive obliterative cholangiopathy with varying degrees of damage to both extra and intrahepatic bile ducts due to unknown causes. The diagnostic studies should be done to diagnose or exclude BA without unnecessary delay. Kasai portoenterostomy is the first choice of treatment for bile drainage from microscopic bile ductules present in the portal fibrous mass. The medical management after Kasai portoenterostomy should be done carefully to maintain bile excretion and prevent and treat complications including cholangitis, hepatic fibrosis, portal hypertension and nutritional problem. The reported five years-survival rates after Kasai portoenterostomy range from 30 to 60%. About 20% of all patients undergoing Kasai portoenterostomy during infancy survive into adulthood with their native liver. Even if Kasai portoenterostomy remains as the first line of treatment in BA, liver transplantation serves as a good salvage treatment when portoenterostomy fails or liver function gradually deteriorates after initially successful establishment of bile flow. Overall 5-year survival rate in BA is about 90% in recent series.

The prognostic factors for extrahepatic biliary atresia (EHBA) after Kasai portoenterostomy include the patient's age at portoenterostomy (age), size of bile duct in theporta hepatis (size), clearance of jaundice after operation (clearance) and the surgeon's experience. The aim of this study is to examine the most significant prognostic factor of EHBA after Kasai portoenterostomy. This retrospective study was done in 51 cases of EHBA that received Kasai portoenterostomy by one pediatric surgeon. For the statistical analysis, Kaplan-Meier method, Logrank test and Cox regression test were used. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered to be significant. Fifteen patients were regarded as dead in this study, including nine cases of liver transplantation. There was no significant difference of survival to age. The age is also not a significant risk factor for survival in this study (Cox Regression test; p = 0.63). There was no significant difference in survival in relation to the size of bile duct. However, bile duct size was a significant risk factor for survival (Cox Regression test; p = 0.002). There was a significant difference in relation to survival and clearance (Kaplan-Meier method; p = 0.02). The clearing was also a significant risk factor for survival (Cox Regression test; p = 0.001). The clearance of jaundice is the most significant prognostic factor of EHBA after Kasai portoenterostomy.

The results of hepatic portojejunostomy in 34 patients with biliary atresia operated upon by one surgeon between May 1989 and December 1997 were analyzed. Eleven (32.3 %) patients were 60 days or younger, 14 patient (41.2 %) were between 60 and 90 days, and 9 (26.5 %) were over 90 days of age. Jaundice cleared in 20 cases (58.8 %). Three patients died of liver insufficiency, 2 were anicteric but died from esophageal variceal bleeding. Three patients died as a result of sepsis, heart failure and left kidney agenesis. Five patients were lost to follow-up. The five-year survival rate was 73.8 %. Two patients over 90 days of age, survived more than 5 years. Survival rates were not significantly related to the age at operation. We conclude that hepatic portojejunostomy should be considered as a primary surgical modality for biliary atresia, even at age 90 days or more. Early detection of esophageal varices and sclerotherapy may be necessary. Liver transplantation is necessary if hepatic failure develops.